Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Whatever Happened To The Caped Crusader?

THE DARK KNIGHT just killed off the superhero movie.

I sat through this 2.5 hour epic crime drama and felt uneasy throughout, kind of like watching "24" when it was on television (remember those days?). And it was a great experience too, not knowing what was going to happen at any given moment. The girl dies, the heroes lose, the bad guy successfully manipulates the situation to its bitter and tragic end. If I wasn't such an easy mark for this movie (I loved director Christopher Nolan's previous entry BATMAN BEGINS), I might protest this as some post-modern, gaudy emo-fest. But that's not the film we got here. No, THE DARK KNIGHT diminishes the superhero genre by elevating the material.

One doesn't need much reminding- the world is dangerous.  Our post-9/11 fear of chaos may have lessened from its peak from several years ago, but speaking for myself, I still haven't forgotten my fears which were formed on that day. Nolan and his writer-brother Jonathan Nolan exploit these emotions rather shamelessly (and effectively) to drive the point home-- that a guy in a batsuit fighting a malcontent psycho clown can be some pretty serious business.

Gone are the indulgences of the typical superhero movie. There is no plucky sidekick (sorry, Robin), there are no hybrid man-animal villains (sorry, Man-Bat!). What we have is The Joker-- the world's worst kind of villain. He is a man who seeks to turn a system against itself. He is a villain that would, in another part of the world, set up roadside bombs and attack U.S. troops in a foreign land. He is someone who does not seek a fortune or a seat of power. He is simply someone who wishes "to watch the world burn." This is someone that we see every single day on the news. It is an enemy that we don't fully understand. We either attempt to avoid this type of chaos, or as in the case of Batman, face it directly. That threshold decision is an important one- it defines the manner in which a society functions (and what that society is willing to tolerate).

Just as in the real world, you don't get a clean victory (or any victory for that matter) from fighting this kind of opponent. One small win against The Joker is quickly erased by a drastic and tragic outcome. This relates to the theme of escalation that Police Commissioner Jim Gordon warns of at the end of the previous Batman movie. When you bring a force upon a situation, you trigger an opposing one. Batman helped to create The Joker by arriving in Gotham City. Is this a not-so-subtle allegory to what is transpiring in the Middle East? If only the moral questions were that simple! Goodbye Gotham, welcome to the real world!

And that's what THE DARK KNIGHT does best- it asks those moral questions and shows when the good guys stumbling towards the answers. By the film's end, Batman chooses a path I never expected or witnessed in any other film- the hero chooses to become the villain. It is a complex decision, but one which redefines what true heroism means. The end strips away the remaining fragments of a comic book story and leaves us with a truly inspiring example. This is mythology for a different kind of world, one that cannot be broken down into four-colors and neat panels on a page. And at the same time, the characters still hold true to their source material, showing that the ideals of decades past still resonate somewhat. In many respects that is comforting. But to bridge that gap, it takes a filmmaker to translate the characters into a relevant form, dare I say rendering the conventional superhero genre obsolete. Gone is the Caped Crusader, long live The Dark Knight!

7 comments:

The Shadow said...

That was a well done commentary. I'm a 3-time Dark Knight watcher, and love the fear and terror brought to the screen by Heath Ledger's Joker. The world we live in today isn't much better than the Gotham one, but sadly we don't have anyone like Batman to save us from the Jokers of the world.

Adam said...

Thanks, shadow, I appreciate your comment. I think this movie breaks new ground in a well-trodden genre. Will it become its own trend? I don't know, but it defintiely makes some of these other movies seem silly in comparison.

Rickey Henderson said...

Great write up. You're spot on--due to the unsettling elements and uncompromising grittiness, this batman movie felt more relevant than any other superhero movie that Rickey's ever seen. A dark archetype for a very dark world. Like you said: a new mythology.

Rickey maintains that the potential for this kind of Batman movie has always existed in the subject matter but no one was able to bring it to the screen until Nolan came along.

AmyV said...

i think you're spot-on on a lot of things in this, but didn't you think it was a little _too_ long?

look, Heath was great, Christian was great, everyone was great. maybe my attention span is too short. but it just seemed long...

Adam said...

Rickey- Batman definitely seems to be the most likely superhero candidate for this type of crime-epic story. But even then, Nolan is going out of his way to minimize or elliminate the meta-human aspects of even Batman's world. Maybe this stype of storytelling wouldn't work with other heroes. Could you picture Superman showing up in one of Nolan's Batman movies? I can't.

Amy- you know, the second time around, I felt the movie's length a bit more than the first viewing. I think the Hong Kong subplot, while cool, was superfluous and could have been taken out entirely (and told through expository dialogue). It was a little too James Bond-ish as well. Really, shaving 15 minutes could make all the difference.

There are faults to the movie, no doubt. But they are so easily forgiven when you see how much work was put into its attributes.

Sally Jo said...

I agree with your assessment of the movie. 'course I can't help but be reminded a little of another hero/villian. Hopefully we'll be seeing more of his complex ethical decisions come January.

Sally Jo said...
This comment has been removed by the author.